korider.com | Hyosung Motorcycle Owners Forum

korider.com | Hyosung Motorcycle Owners Forum

  • June 23, 2017, 06:20:46 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search

News:

Welcome to Korider.com!

Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: turbo thoughts....  (Read 1724 times)

Cloud

  • Korider's Fastest GT125R.
  • Forum Addict
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2291
  • Head removal specialist.
Re: turbo thoughts....
« Reply #10 on: March 15, 2017, 04:39:10 AM »

Sounds like a topic for thw some like it... Section

Id prefer not to rib HP fron the crank to make HP.

But im surebit xan brme done. With out leaking. There is the nifty cat in the middle of the cover.

Side note Cloud.  I was joking about ur age the othe other day but i look at ur profile and it says u r 137

Take the starter motor. Turn it into an output mechanism for the supercharger. You don't need a starter, you need more power. Push-starting is retro cool, like teaming a lumberjack beard with a pompadour and a bow tie.

Yes I am a 137 year old Ukrainian succubus but I don't feel a day over 129.
Logged

Register and log in and the Ads below will be gone! :D


retryW

  • Regular rider
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 99
Re: turbo thoughts....
« Reply #11 on: March 15, 2017, 05:58:43 AM »

Yes I am a 137 year old Ukrainian succubus but I don't feel a day over 129.

I'd be very interested to see what a '137 year old Ukrainian succubus' looks like :P
Logged

Cloud

  • Korider's Fastest GT125R.
  • Forum Addict
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2291
  • Head removal specialist.
Re: turbo thoughts....
« Reply #12 on: March 15, 2017, 06:21:22 AM »

http://korider.com/index.php?topic=24654.msg225020#msg225020

Yes, turbocharging is better. Better results less power drain whoooo recycling energy from exhaust buuuuut, I've always preferred using supercharged stuff to turbo stuff. It's more wonderful.

Turbocharging is like Metallica. It's popular for a reason. It's correct, it's the daddy, it is the way things should be, and to deviate is simply to go wrong. But I'm all about a bit of Skid Row.
Logged

retryW

  • Regular rider
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 99
Re: turbo thoughts....
« Reply #13 on: March 15, 2017, 07:13:56 AM »

You don't look a day over 20. However you have a bit of a 'steel'y look on your face ;P
Logged

Dojy_biker

  • Goodbye chickenstrips!
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 176
Re: turbo thoughts....
« Reply #14 on: March 15, 2017, 10:16:35 AM »

had a thought.... the turbo from a SMART car... its rated for about the same CC's...
Logged
***Solution looking for a problem***

umop-ǝpisdn

  • Global Moderator
  • Forum Addict
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6236
Re: turbo thoughts....
« Reply #15 on: March 15, 2017, 12:05:27 PM »

Re: smart car turbo - Right CC's but wrong RPM's though.

Think cubic litres of air per minute.

A smart car turbo would be far too small. What you want is a turbo roughly correct for VW Polo 1.4 TSI. However, manifolding for those turbos is an issue, since they're twin scroll.
Logged
I used to be a sensitive, new age guy, but times have changed and now I am more of a caring, understanding, ninties type.

albertinhouston

  • Scraping the pegs
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 576
Re: turbo thoughts....
« Reply #16 on: March 15, 2017, 02:41:49 PM »

Best I could do to track you down. wink wink.


I'm all for building things that are not the norm.
-gs500e with a yz 490 2stroke dirt bike motor in it.
-Hyo 250 with a dr650 motor. E-start of course.
-91 bandit400 with 97 gsxr 750 motor stuffed in it.  :D :D :D  That's my favorite. still have this one. I now have a 99  FI 750 motor to be put in it.

I'll probably order  1 tiny turbo fri. I'm curious to see how small it really is.  If its too small I'm sure I could resale it at min. loss.


« Last Edit: March 15, 2017, 06:36:28 PM by albertinhouston »
Logged

Dojy_biker

  • Goodbye chickenstrips!
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 176
Re: turbo thoughts....
« Reply #17 on: March 16, 2017, 12:21:38 AM »

Re: smart car turbo - Right CC's but wrong RPM's though.

Think cubic litres of air per minute.

how so?
smart cars (early ones are 600cc, later 700cc) rev to 5500 RPM, starts to come on boost at 2000rpm making 3.5 to 4 psi.

So lets half the flow rate by putting one on each cylinder of a hyo, that way would start to come on boost at 4000rpm , and at hyo's redline of 10500rpm , the turbo would still be dealing with the same cubic gas flow rate as the car would. With some boost control supposedly possible to get higher boost pressure.

i had thought this through, but if ive missed something, let me know ;)

Theyre also quite compact and relatively cheap
Logged
***Solution looking for a problem***

albertinhouston

  • Scraping the pegs
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 576
Re: turbo thoughts....
« Reply #18 on: March 16, 2017, 12:49:34 AM »

We dont have the as an option here in the states.
Logged

umop-ǝpisdn

  • Global Moderator
  • Forum Addict
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6236
Re: turbo thoughts....
« Reply #19 on: March 16, 2017, 08:46:19 AM »

Dojy,

I assumed you were talking about using a single turbo, as you said 'same cc'.

If you are using two then indeed they would work.
Logged
I used to be a sensitive, new age guy, but times have changed and now I am more of a caring, understanding, ninties type.

Pages: 1 [2] 3